Raw footage and the Clypmint edit

Watch the source and result

The raw take is wide and unedited. The Warm edit reframes it for vertical viewing and adds captions, product cards and sound. Play both videos with sound to compare the full result.

What this example demonstrates

• A finished edit made from an existing recording.
• Vertical reframing of a wide source.
• Captions and product graphics placed around the speaker.
• A style applied to team footage rather than a generated presenter.

This is one recording in one style. It does not establish that every source, language or editing brief will produce the same result. It is not a benchmark against a human editor or another product, and it does not demonstrate every revision workflow.

Test the job you actually need done

1. Use a recording you would otherwise send to an editor.
2. Write the audience, output format, target length and points that must stay.
3. Pick a style and inspect the entire exported video.
4. Ask for one specific change. Check the revised MP4 for that change and for unintended changes.

Check the spoken meaning, caption spelling, timing, graphics, framing and audio. Judge whether the result is ready for your audience.

• Which editing jobs Clypmint can take over
• Current product facts and pricing